<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not for humans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/</link>
	<description>Our quirky little blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: forkboy1965</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-3124</link>
		<dc:creator>forkboy1965</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/?p=3186#comment-3124</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the better question is to whom or what are they selling this stuff if it&#039;s not for human use?

Aliens?  Kittens?  Flesh eating bacteria?

Inquiring minds want to know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the better question is to whom or what are they selling this stuff if it&#8217;s not for human use?</p>
<p>Aliens?  Kittens?  Flesh eating bacteria?</p>
<p>Inquiring minds want to know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-3118</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/?p=3186#comment-3118</guid>
		<description>Ok, I now understand the 99.9% - 90% connection. Thanks for the clarification.

Let&#039;s take up the usage conversation. What the heck is this stuff for if it&#039;s not approved for human use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I now understand the 99.9% &#8211; 90% connection. Thanks for the clarification.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take up the usage conversation. What the heck is this stuff for if it&#8217;s not approved for human use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conall</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator>Conall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/?p=3186#comment-3117</guid>
		<description>@ Mark

I&#039;m with you. The Dimethyl Sulfoxide in the compound is 99.9% pure, but only 90% of the contents of this tub is Dimethyl Sulfoxide.

That said, who this product is intended for is a very good question! Maybe targeting the Terminator market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mark</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you. The Dimethyl Sulfoxide in the compound is 99.9% pure, but only 90% of the contents of this tub is Dimethyl Sulfoxide.</p>
<p>That said, who this product is intended for is a very good question! Maybe targeting the Terminator market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-3116</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/?p=3186#comment-3116</guid>
		<description>@ Mark 

Um, I think your mind must be be sharper than mine. Not only do I not understand how you could be correct, I don&#039;t quite grasp what you&#039;re trying to explain.

Can you try explaining yourself again please? Forgive my mental slowness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mark </p>
<p>Um, I think your mind must be be sharper than mine. Not only do I not understand how you could be correct, I don&#8217;t quite grasp what you&#8217;re trying to explain.</p>
<p>Can you try explaining yourself again please? Forgive my mental slowness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/not-for-humans/comment-page-1/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenmonkeydog.com/?p=3186#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>perhaps the numbers are not actually in conflict....the number on the front purports that the Dimethyl Sulfoxide in this product is 99.9% pure Dimethyl Sulfoxide....the number on the back under list of ingredients purports that Dimethyl Sulfoxide makes up 90% of the active ingredients and do not describe at all the purity of the Dimethyl Sulfoxide (which we now understand to be 99.9% pure).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps the numbers are not actually in conflict&#8230;.the number on the front purports that the Dimethyl Sulfoxide in this product is 99.9% pure Dimethyl Sulfoxide&#8230;.the number on the back under list of ingredients purports that Dimethyl Sulfoxide makes up 90% of the active ingredients and do not describe at all the purity of the Dimethyl Sulfoxide (which we now understand to be 99.9% pure).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

